Thursday, March 12, 2009

Nz Silver Fern Tattoo

The cry of the bodies. Herman


By: Ciro Palacios visual artist and professor at the University of Lima


The Art of Francis Bacon

Francis Bacon. After leaving the halls of the Tate Gallery in London, the stunning retrospective of Bacon, one of the most important artists of the twentieth century is on display now in the Museo del Prado, not far from the paintings of Velazquez, the British artist much admired .

When asked about the violence of his paintings, Francis Bacon often evoked tensions overwhelmed him in childhood and adolescence. Born in Dublin on October 28, 1909, he spent six years of his childhood in Ireland, where she faced early stage of social and political violence, the threat of snipers and hidden bombs that marked him forever. The idea of \u200b\u200binstant death in the middle of the night causes a strong impression on this child of great imagination.


The expulsion from school and home when he was 16 years led to a rebellious spirit and questioning minds aroused strong feelings, determined to uncover and develop their true instincts and follow them to their end. Berlin was in exile and there had contact with a strong cultural atmosphere, was drawn to the continental sophistication and met the vices of a bustling metropolis. In 1927 and 1928 moves between Paris and Berlin, working on decorating until the meeting with Picasso's work impels him to devote himself to painting. In 1929 he returned to London and begins as a self-taught oil painting.

In 1944, before his lack of success, destroyed almost all his works. That same year, the triptych "Three Studies for Figures next to a crucifixion" will mark the resumption of his career on a greenfield basis. In 1948 the Museum of Modern Art New York and buy one of his works in 1949, his first painting inspired by the "Innocent X" by Velázquez, finally made a series of solo exhibitions.

THE CREATOR
Francis Bacon never wanted to be classified and always shied away from the labels. Some experts called it a neo-expressionist figurative and others, but he suggests in interviews their displeasure with both views. Is heir to the fascination with the movement that characterizes the twentieth century, but his approach to the Muybridge photos away from kinship with the futuristic, unites more existential absurdity of a Beckett whose lonely people drag their bodies racked by time. Bacon shows in his work this time, without emotions surface, trying to prove the being-in-the-time that we all, that time is made flesh living matter is not fixed and, therefore, we must show its constant mutation. Dig your brutal act on the faces of their models to find, deep in his heart.

In his work, the act of painting gives participation at random and fortuitous that arises unexpectedly at any time by changing to the very subject of the picture. Makes marks, clean, scrub spots or areas, strip the paint under varying speeds and angles, suggesting that there is already on the canvas as in your head Figurative virtual data. These will be subject to the power of action gradually pulling away the marks original pictorial material, and with it, very suggestive and involuntary forms of movement will emerge.

mouth and openings that extend from one end to another of the body are an obsession: it is movement through which the body tends to leak. Thus emerges another world of irrational lines, inadvertent, accidental, of mixed feelings, strokes, unrepresentative, or illustrative, or narrative, manuals, almost blind attest to the intrusion of another world in the imagination.

THE BODY Y THE CRY
painter Francis Bacon was a paradigm for capturing the painful condition of man from the harshest singularity. The main reason stated in her scenes is the body, studying hard watching the classic painting and documentary photography and journalism, to collect forms from the empirical world that guide the search for traces of the invisible , those forces trying to capture and present in his paintings.

Bacon made an anatomy of the human self-destructiveness; tested catch the intensity of bodily experience in those moments of pain and ecstasy that foreshadow the disappearance and we face the physical body. In the disfigured, deformed, mutilated and faces on the edge of disappearance that make his work, we can not fail to evoke the Freudian uncanny, the uncanny that for Lacan is the plug indispensable for addressing anxiety as a phenomenon observable. The uncanny, as Freud said, is where are closer to the aesthetics and psychoanalysis, hence it has been argued that Freud treats it as an aesthetic category of the same draft that the sublime.

The "Saturn Devouring His Son" Goya is an important precedent Baconians characters. In this work the teacher English alters the normal configuration of the body of Saturn in their limbs and trunk to make a proper motion of the transformation of the character portrayed. There is something in these players Bacon endorses and becomes visible: the cry of their bodies. His painting will cry visible to us, the raging in the body to reach the mouth open, like an abyss, leading to our mind.


Bacon

questions identity, values \u200b\u200band the control of the body in which man usually build their lives and just do it based its artistic production in the obsession distorted body man. His images respond to the idea that the body is no longer seen as the space, the shelter, which ensures the idea of \u200b\u200bself, but on the contrary, the domain where the self is answered, and even lost.

"Bacon lived at the time that fatally eludes me," says Kundera. The man believed to have control over their own bodies but their existence is based on permanent instability. Is the time that questions the identity and values \u200b\u200bwhich are regarded as the man and the body is rebuilt, transferred or exceeded its borders. In short, Bacon was not only one of the great painters of the human form, but also one of the great searchers of the human condition, and from the perspective of today, one of the greatest artists of the twentieth century. He left to mankind an art like no other reflecting the anguish of our time.


Article published in "Sunday" of the newspaper "El Comercio", Sunday February 22, 2009.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Timberlands Hurt Ankle

Parret: between vision and touch


A theme discussed in the seminar Parret Herman gave us recently (see previous publications) was the difference between aesthetics and art oculocentrista and its opposite, the aesthetics of touch or Acari eye ence. To put

in short, has been the tradition oculocentrismo central ( mainstream ) of aesthetics and art. Paradigm of this way of understanding art was the work of Giambattista Alberti in Della pittura work, which inaugurates a new era in the history of Western art and bases raised the prospect that "must" sort out all figurative image. It exploits the power of "seeing eye" that builds a visual pyramid, making the distance between the observer and the observed fixed, and the light is stable. It is, in short, a look that is separated from the observed, a look, or position of observation "objectifying." This view raises a distance necessary for the construction of what looks, the "objectivity" is possible only at a distance "maximum." In this sense it is relevant, its analysis Parret of a painting with the theme of the Annunciation by Domenico Veneziano in the quattrocento , where you can see the central pyramid organizing perspective.
oculocentrismo
This is a whole philosophy, which proposes to look at as the ultimate sensory capacity among all the senses. And apart from the other sensory abilities.

We can say, semiotically speaking, it is a strategy of disengagement .

De otro lado, existe toda otra epistemología que se funda en la experiencia del tocar. Aquí el tacto se pone en la cima de jerarquía sensorial, y es esta experiencia la que ordena la sensorialidad en general. Incluso en la visión se trata de "la mirada que toca". Es Nietzche quien acuña el término oculocentrismo, precisamente para criticarlo duramente como paradigma de pensamiento occidental, como mito de la "transparencia", "pureza", o "neutralidad" de la mirada. Es una crítica dura a una filosofía de caracter "escópica".

Nietzche se ubica en un paradigma alternativo, un sensualismo radical que permite apreciar todos los sentidos; un sensualismo que destrona al ojo and re-evaluate and put in a higher sense called "intimate" (taste, smell and touch). This assessment involves the upgrading of the inner sensation of the body (not the material body or physiological) of a living body .



In any sensory experience, this paradigm touch, marks a necessary closeness, an intimacy imperative that organizes experiences, including visual or auditory. It is, in short, the entirety of lived body, which get caught in a cross sensory - synesthetic - of what is presented to the senses, and consistently integrated into the body . So Nietzsche

preferred both as a sculptor Canova, here in the play "The Three Graces." Because the finesse of the work of Canova is a constant invitation to touch, even caress the smoothness of the surface that emulates the human skin. The

semiotically, it is a clutch , construction of a proximity necessary for the survival of the body, and the recognition of any presence.

is not just two ways of feeling, but two epistemologies or paradigms that organize the aesthetics, philosophy and even science.



Parret
photo: Pipo Garcia Contte
Sources: Notes Parret Herman presentation, including visual material

Monday, March 9, 2009

Words For Marrid Greeting

Parret Herman was appointed Honorary Associate


On Wednesday March 4, at 6:30 during the International Seminar on Professor Herman Parret was teaching at the University of Lima, the Peruvian Association of Semiotics took the opportunity to make a small and meaningful ceremony. Thus, Parret Herman has been named Honorary Associate, in recognition of their teaching and dissemination of semiotics in Peru.

remember that Herman has Parret several times to Peru (the same teacher questions if they are 4 or 5 times), and these opportunities have been several international seminars (provided at the University of Lima). By 2000, Herman Parret received the honorary degree of Doctor of the University of Lima. Herman


Parret was very pleased to be a member of our association, said they always felt welcome in Lima. We hope that soon again.

Thanks Herman! Tot
ziens! (Up soon)

Jose "Pipo" Garcia Contte



A Semiotics of the Peruvian Association with Parret Herman
Photo: Pamela Pozo

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Connective Tissue Disease

International Seminar on Semiotics and Aesthetics



Between 3 and March 6 has been developed at the University of Lima, the International Seminar on Semiotics and Aesthetics, by Professor Herman Parret (University of Leuven). The central issue addressed during the seminar was contemporary art, and the analysis variables between semiotics and aesthetics, and of course, the proposed Parret, a "semi-aesthetic."

The seminar has run normally (except for the initial postponement due to a problem in international traffic by Professor Parret USA).

Note the large crowd that had the seminar, in which participating students, teachers, Lima and many who have flown in specially from the provinces (Trujillo, Chimbote, among others).

The teacher was very didactic Parret tico in their presentations, despite the inevitable difficulties in translating of exposure performed in French. Desiderio Professor White, with the support of two colleagues (Oscar Quezada and Jose Garcia), is in charge of the translation exposure.

also Professor White has been the translator of the book "Epiphanies of the Presence" by Herman Parret. This book was recently published by the University of Lima and is on sale in Libun at the University of Lima. Parret's book addresses precisely the issues that have been presented at the Seminar Aryan.

Photo: Pamela Pozo